Skip to content
Explore the latest in technology, digital innovation, and w…

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Shape Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Position in the Global Order

Following executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the nation-building business.

In a notable news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president stated that US forces had effectively seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" actually means is unclear, but the pledge represents an abrupt shift in direction for the president, laden with contradictions and formidable challenges.

A leader who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now betting his administration on effectively rebuilding a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been eroded by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly confident.

He said his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He pledged to recruit American oil firms to repair Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, supplying financing for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out sending American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has altered Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is more than willing to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have mostly involved rockets and aircraft that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly distinct.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be tough for some of Trump's backers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of abandoning his core supporters, was quick to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's endless use of force and backing for foreign wars is understandable because we are forced to pay for it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "firm and legitimate".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US supremacy in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and assets that are central to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will provoke broader questions in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement expressing surprise and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible assault on a independent country.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable condemnations of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced worry about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's choice not to inform congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That mission was a success – with zero American casualties and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most stunning, effective and impressive demonstrations of American power and competency in American history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US says it will take over administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unclear. He and his team must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a region that is bound to be cautious of what Trump's international strategy has in store for them.

The writer

Matthew Saunders

A tech journalist and digital strategist passionate about emerging technologies and their impact on modern business.

FreshWave

Type to search articles.